LOL!

You clearly know absolutely nothing about economics.

Land is the classic example of a factor of production giving rise to economic rent. In fact, for reasons of justice and efficiency, people should never be able to “own” land in the sense of being able to reap the fruit of the land itself for free, because (a) they didn’t create the land, and (b) they’re excluding others from using the land. (For more, see “Are you a Real Libertarian, or a ROYAL Libertarian?.)

The reason that copyright should be limited is that it, like other so-called intellectual property rights, is a severe constraint on freedom—that’s one of its most important costs. On the other hand, its putative benefit (the one recognized in the US constitution, for example)—that of allowing the creation of works of art by allowing creators to recoup sunk (non-marginal costs)—can be realized without recourse to absurd measures like perpetual copyright.

StefanoC: thanks for the ‘bug report’ and I will check that inequality out.

Thanks to everyone else who has made comments. They are all much appreciated.